Translate This Page
CALL FOR ICNIRP TO END ITS OWN PATHETIC EXISTENCE
Reza Ganjavi's Email to ICNIRP following their new embarrassing / pro-industry guidelines that still ignore biological impact
Eric van Rongen, Martin Röösli, Karine Chabrel, and the rest of your pro-industry ICNIRP cartel:
SHAME ON YOU FOR ONCE AGAIN IGNORING BIOLOGICAL IMPACT OF RF-EMF, IN FAVOR OF THE WICKED INDUSTRY, AGAINST OUR HEALTH, AND YOU HAVE THE NERVE TO SHAMELESSLY SAY YOUR PATHETIC USELESS "GUIDELINES" "will help put people at ease". It will put stupid people who blindly follow the garbage you feed them at ease. ICNIRP's new guidelines will have the opposite effect and increase public concerns about wireless technology because the guidelines only protect us from short-term heating (thermal / physics) effects and COMPLETELY IGNORE our BIOLOGY, WELLBEING, HEALTH.
ICNIRP continues to dismiss the many hundreds of peer-reviewed studies that have found biologic and health effects from exposure to low-intensity, radio frequency radiation including many human as well as animal studies. The preponderance of the research has found evidence of increased cancer incidence, oxidative stress, DNA damage, and infertility from exposure to wireless radiation.
ICNIRP should close its doors and end its own miserable existence that's contributing to lies, deception, falsehoods, and biological damage caused by RF-EMF.
By the way, despite not being a Medical Doctor or Biologist, as an epidemiologist Martin Röösli should be very interested in Coronavirus. Now ask yourselves -- use your brains and put all your intellectual or other conflict of interest aside: DID YOU KNOW THAT RF-EMF EXPOSURE WEAKENS THE IMMUNE SYSTEM?
Did you know Wuhan has had a massive 5G deployment?
Did you know that the WORLD WHICH IS HIGHLY POLLUTED WITH RF-EMF (THANKS TO ICNIRP'S ROLE) in prone to mass devastation because your beloved wireless industry hasn't left many corners untouched by this cancerous, DNA damaging radiation which YOU have downplayed as only having thermal issues!
Röösli, in his regular attempts to downplay RF-EMF risks, said in a lecture that my neighbor attended that food also causes oxidative stress. SO WHAT? An elephant is an animal and so is an ant!
PLEASE, CLOSE DOWN ICNIRP. Do the right thing and call it quits instead of giving continuity to its pathetic existence.
Réza Ganjavi, MBA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUMxPxZdUfY email@example.com www.rezamusic.com www.facebook.com/rganjavi www.emfcrisis.com Swiss Stop-5G: https://www.facebook.com/groups/358542968210641/ Global Stop-5G: https://www.facebook.com/groups/stop5g/ * Sent from my WIRED Internet connection
Email by Dr. Joel M. Moskowitz (12 March 2020)
New Guidelines Adopted by the International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Protect Us Only from Thermal or Heating Effects
The ICNIRP issued a media release today to announce the publication of its new human exposure guidelines for non-ionizing radiation (100 KHz to 300 GHz) in the journal Health Physics. The guidelines address radio, WiFi, and Bluetooth in addition to 3G, 4G, and 5G cell phones and cell towers.
According to ICNIRP Chairman, Eric van Rongen, "We know parts of the community are concerned about the safety of 5G and we hope the updated guidelines will help put people at ease."
However, ICNIRP's new guidelines are likely to have the opposite effect and increase public concerns about wireless technology because the guidelines were designed to protect us only from short-term heating (or thermal) effects. The guidelines fail to protect us from non-thermal effects, especially from long-term exposure to wireless radiation because ICNIRP continues to dismiss the many hundreds of peer-reviewed studies that have found biologic and health effects from exposure to low-intensity, radio frequency radiation including many human as well as animal studies. The preponderance of the research has found evidence of increased cancer incidence, oxidative stress, DNA damage, and infertility from exposure to wireless radiation.
For more information see:
ICNIRP’s Exposure Guidelines for Radio Frequency Fields https://www.saferemr.com/2018/07/icnirps-exposure-guidelines-for-radio.html
Effects of 5G wireless communication on human health
EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service
Author: Miroslava Karaboytcheva
Members' Research Service PE 646.172 – March 2020
The fifth generation of telecommunications technologies, 5G, is fundamental to achieving a European gigabit society by 2025.
The aim to cover all urban areas, railways and major roads with uninterrupted fifth generation wireless communication can only be achieved by creating a very dense network of antennas and transmitters. In other words, the number of higher frequency base stations and other devices will increase significantly.
This raises the question as to whether there is a negative impact on human health and environment from higher frequencies and billions of additional connections, which, according to research, will mean constant exposure for the whole population, including children.
Whereas researchers generally consider such radio waves not to constitute a threat to the population, research to date has not addressed the constant exposure that 5G would introduce. Accordingly, a section of the scientific community considers that more research on the potential negative biological effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) and 5G is needed, notably on the incidence of some serious human diseases. A further consideration is the need to bring together researchers from different disciplines, in particular medicine and physics or engineering, to conduct further research into the effects of 5G.
The EU’s current provisions on exposure to wireless signals, the Council Recommendation on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz), is now 20 years old, and thus does not take the specific technical characteristics of 5G into account.
For more information see:
Scientific American Created Confusion about 5G's Safety: Will They Clear It Up? (includes "5G, Public Health and Uncomfortable Truths")
Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director
Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley
Electromagnetic Radiation Safety